Information
& Data
Management
Clinical &
Translational
Research
Leadership
Management
Pre-Award
Research
Compliance
Post-Award
Commercialization
& Innovation
Technology
Systems

Post-Award

Award and Account Setup

Once a sponsor makes an award to an institution the award document establishes the legal and regulatory parameters for the researcher to access and track funds and other project details. This becomes the primary financial management tool that restricts awarded funds for use on only the funded project. The proper setup of the awarded budget and other details contributes to overall effective management and administration.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with accounting practices for sponsored funds, and unfamiliar with institutional practices for setting up project accounts to manage finances and administrative details. Needs to be trained on the institution’s financial system.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Some familiarity with sponsored fund accounting practices, and able to create a basic account in the institution’s financial system under close supervision. Able to transfer the awarded budget into the financial system, and able to identify and record project report deadlines and other required data elements for the account. Able to transmit new account information to researchers using standard templates and procedures. Able to manage tracking of expenditures against budget for allowability, allocability, and appropriateness.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can independently set up new accounts of all types and distinguish among cost reimbursement, fixed price, milestone-based, and other types including cost share. Navigates sponsor guidelines, award documents, and institutional policy to establish a strong basis for ongoing award management. Competently communicates with the researcher to resolve questions and concerns.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Competent in restricted fund accounting practices and capably sets up complex accounts, such as multi-year, multi-investigator projects. Possesses expertise in the institution’s financial system and contributes to establishment and maintenance of staff training. Assists with creation and maintenance of institutional policy and procedure. Assists with resolution of errors.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads training for staff and researchers on award elements and financial regulations, allocates available unit resources such as people and budget, and develops financial policy and procedure for sponsored funds. Resolves issues and problems related to this function.

Award Management

Effective award management requires attention to sponsor guidelines, institutional policy, regulatory requirements, timeline management, and financial monitoring. Excellent management also requires resource allocation, risk mitigation, and effective communication to achieve project goals within budgetary limits. Both the research team and sponsored programs staff have award management duties.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with roles and responsibilities of those involved in award management, and needs training in related policy, procedure, and use of institutional tools.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: With supervision, can review budgeted expenses against actual expenditures, monitor the project timeline and anticipate upcoming deadlines, and process standard forms using standard procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently monitors expenditures to ensure that expenses are reasonable, allocable, and allowable under sponsor policy. Able to determine if sponsor prior approval is needed for budgetary or programmatic changes, monitors and revises budgets including cost sharing, prepares invoices and makes cash draws in accordance with sponsor procedures. Research staff also balances accounts on a regular basis and securely maintains expense documentation.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Reviews and resolves unusual, questionable, or high-risk transactions. Works with researchers, other financial staff, procurement, and other stakeholders to help ensure compliance with financial and programmatic expectations. Assists with training staff and researchers on financial regulations and award management best practices and institutional procedures. Resolves issues and problems related to this function.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads award management activities. Develops policies and procedures to promote financial compliance and best practices. Engages with researchers, leadership, auditors, and other stakeholders to resolve questions and concerns, and investigates allegations of financial misconduct. May serve as the institutional signatory for invoices and other financial documents.

Project Reporting

Both financial reports and programmatic reports are typically required by sponsors on a periodic basis as well as at the end of the project. These reports support the transparent and accountable review of research projects and associated expenditures. Required reporting also provides a defined time for thorough review of the research trajectory and the budget so that course corrections can be made in a prompt and transparent way. Compliant and thorough reporting paves the way to ongoing and future support of a research program and the institution.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unaware of financial and programmatic practices in research, and needs training on policy, procedure, and institutional resources.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Under close supervision can generate an expense report for a project using the institution’s standard operating procedures. Can communicate with researchers and others using existing templates and procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can independently prepare complex financial reports, working collaboratively with financial staff and research staff to address discrepancies and correct errors. Monitors reporting deadlines and alerts researchers to programmatic report deadlines and content requirements.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Reviews financial reports for accuracy and clarity, and resolves questions, concerns, and errors. Ensures revenue has been received and applied to the correct account. Provides training to staff and researchers on policy, procedure, and best practices. Resolves issues and problems related to this function.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads financial and administrative activities to help ensure that reports are clear, accurate, and submitted on time. Leads development of institutional policy and procedure that supports a culture of accountability and transparency. Interacts with sponsors, leadership, auditors, and other stakeholders to solve problems and improve processes.

Award Closeout

Besides final reports, some sponsors also require submission of forms, certifications, or other types of documentation. Award closeout also includes closing of institutional accounts and associated activities. This is a collaborative activity among researchers, research staff, and sponsored program staff.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unaware of sponsor or institutional policy and processes for proposer closeout of a sponsored project.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Can complete some closeout forms such as standard sponsor forms and invention disclosure reports under close supervision. Able to communicate with researchers, technology transfer staff, and others to gather closeout data, using existing templates and procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can independently compile and submit closeout packages that are accurate and on time. Ensures cost share requirements have been met, unallowable costs have been removed, subaward expenses are accounted for, and encumbrances have been cleared from the account. Communicates clearly with researchers and others as appropriate to gather necessary information and documentation.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Provides training to staff on processes and procedures required for account close activities. Works with staff and researchers to resolve account problems and correct errors. Balances complex budgets, and ensures that billings and payments are complete. Determines the disposition of residual balances and issues refunds to sponsors or transfers to other non-sponsored accounts per institutional policy.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads all closeout efforts as part of sponsored programs financial services. Develops and delivers training to staff and researchers on closeout procedures and ensures that internal and external deadlines are met. Provides expertise on sponsor regulations, and collaborates with researchers, other financial staff, leadership, auditors, and other stakeholders to resolve questions and concerns. Resolves complex agency, regulatory, reporting, and financial issues relating to project close-out.

Effort Reporting

This function is designed to provide documentation that the research team has devoted a reasonable amount of time to a funded project by comparing budgeted effort promised in the proposal with actual effort devoted to and billed to the project. The goal of Effort Reporting is the accurate tracking and review of a project’s personnel labor effort.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with Effort Reporting principles or processes, and requires training on regulations, policy, and institutional practices for recording and reporting of salary and wage data.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Under close supervision, able to prepare project labor cost reports using existing institutional processes. Able to communicate with researchers and others using existing templates and procedures. Able to securely store verified reports (if stored separately from an electronic system).

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently collaborates with researchers to answer questions, follow up on delinquent reports, and make corrections to labor charges. Retrieves completed reports as needed for sponsors and auditors or other stakeholders.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Provides training to staff and researchers on effort reporting regulations and institutional policy and procedure. Collaborates with researchers, payroll staff, and others to solve problems and make corrections.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the Effort Reporting function for the institution. Stays abreast of changing regulations and options for best practices for reporting with the goal of accurate and prompt reports. Follows up with researchers who are delinquent with their reports to provide education and coaching. Works with staff, researchers, leadership, auditors, and other stakeholders to resolve questions and concerns. Develops, maintains, recommends, and integrates internal systems and controls, and improvements. Provides audit oversight for compliance issues.

Subrecipient Monitoring

Subawards issued for significant project work require monitoring of activities and expenditures to ensure compliance with sponsor guidelines and terms and conditions of the subaward agreement. Monitoring is an ongoing, collaborative effort among researchers, research staff, and sponsored program staff.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with subaward monitoring regulations and institutional policies and practices.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Can identify the inclusion of a subaward in a research project; can gather subaward documentation using standard procedures. Under close supervision, can identify necessary data to prepare subaward agreements that will be issued to other experienced research organizations using standard templates and processes, and can identify and enter data to meet Federal Reporting Requirements.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can independently evaluate proposed subrecipients to ensure the entity meets the definition of a subrecipient rather than a vendor. Conducts subrecipient risk assessments and issues subaward agreements. Communicates with researchers for assessment of subrecipient progress and for review and approval of subrecipient’s invoices. In collaboration with the researcher, is able to assess invoices for inclusion of only reasonable, allowable, and allocable costs. Communicates with the subrecipient to resolve questions.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Negotiates terms and conductions of subawards as necessary. Assists with determining additional terms for a high-risk subrecipient, and evaluates and arranges for any subrecipient training needs. Communicates with researchers and subrecipients to resolve problems and concerns. Ensures annual or other assessment of subrecipients’ audits according to institutional policy. May serve as the institutional signatory for subaward agreements.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads subrecipient monitoring efforts for the institution. Develops and delivers training on regulations, policies, and procedures to staff, researchers, and subrecipients as needed. Evaluates high-risk assessments and determines appropriate subaward terms and responses to subrecipient audit findings. Collaborates with researchers, subrecipients, leadership, auditors, and other stakeholders in resolving questions and concerns. May serve as the institutional signatory for subaward agreements.

Indirect Cost Rate Development

: Indirect costs, also called Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs or Overhead, are included as a line item in most research budgets. They ensure that both sponsors and research institutions pay their fair share of research costs, and that those costs are defensible based on applicable regulations and institutional policy. The specific indirect rate used is approved by the federal government through a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) and is based on a set of complex calculations. Rate development considers such things as research space, research expenditures, and institutional administration necessary to support the research function. Some institutions prepare their indirect cost rate proposal in house and some hire expert consultants.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with indirect cost rate development principles and calculations; needs training on policy and procedure.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Under close supervision, is able to access institutional data sources to gather reports on institutional space and expenditures. Also, under supervision, can transfer relevant data to appropriate spreadsheets and other calculation tools.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can aid with identification and calculation of research space square footage through direct observation, discussion with researchers, or other methods. Can identify and locate research equipment using institutional reports and observation, and can identify and locate other institutional data for inclusion in the rate calculation.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Able to identify general maintenance and operational costs, administrative costs, and other costs that support both research and other institutional functions and then calculate a reasonable research cost. Analyzes discrepancies and unusual data, investigates, and makes corrections as needed.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the indirect cost rate development activities for the institution. Working with other financial and information technology staff, ensures ongoing data collection and reporting. Interacts with researchers, other staff, consultants, and the cognizant federal agency reviewing the indirect rate proposal to answer questions and resolve problems and concerns. Keeps leadership informed and presents them with alternatives and rate negotiation information as applicable.

Internal Controls and Audits

Strong internal controls are designed to safeguard assets; prevent fraud, waste, and abuse; and promote accountability and public trust. Research institutions must establish an environment of robust internal controls that supports the integrity, accuracy, and compliance of financial and administrative policies and procedures related to sponsored research. Internal and external audits are a major control activity.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with an internal control framework or principles.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Familiar with one or more of the internal control principles: control environment, risk assessment, information and communication, monitoring activities, and existing control activities. With supervision, is able to identify existing policies and procedures and some basic control practices. Can receive and securely store information and documentation required for a financial or administrative audit.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Familiar with most of the internal control principles. Independently applies existing policies and procedures, and suggests changes and improvements to reduce risk and strengthen the control environment. Able to competently explain policies and procedures to others. Able to gather documentation and information for auditors from multiple sources.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Ensures that internal control principles are considered and upheld in policies and procedures, thus providing reasonable assurance that the research function is operating with integrity. Manages internal and external audits and responds to auditor questions. Conducts periodic assessments of operational components to identify risks in operations, reporting, policy, and compliance.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the internal control and audit function. Supports an organizational structure in line with strong internal controls and management philosophy and operating style. Participates in audit entrance and exit meetings. Consults with leadership and other stakeholders to prepare written responses to any audit findings. Prepares and implements plans to correct deficiencies.

Research Compliance

Sponsor Regulations and Requirements

Federal sponsors must impose federal laws and regulations on funding recipients. Some of these regulations govern the conduct of research activities that involve people, animals, select materials, and national security needs. A robust research compliance program promotes effective adherence to federal regulations plus additional sponsor guidelines, institutional oversight, appropriate reporting, and internal controls in support of ethical research.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with the compliance landscape and must learn the basics of compliance rules and regulations governing the research enterprise, as well as institutional policies and practices.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of one or more major compliance areas, is aware of institutional policy, and can assist with sponsor forms and recording of required data under close supervision.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to review sponsor guidelines and research proposals to identify compliance areas that require institutional approvals and training documentation. Can assist researchers with completion of forms needed for sponsors and for institutional review and approval.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Can provide high-level guidance to researchers and committees to ensure compliance with rules, regulations, and sponsor practices. Assists with development of training materials and other documentation standards for staff and researchers; is responsive to changes in sponsor requirements.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads compliance activities to ensure an environment of ethical research and compliant research practices. Monitors the compliance environment to establish best practices and responds to change. Develops and delivers training to researchers and staff on sponsor requirements. Resolves questions and concerns from researchers, sponsors, auditors, and other stakeholders.

Research Integrity

Research integrity requires knowledge and awareness of ethical principles, best practices, and standards that govern research. This encompasses the core values of honesty, transparency, objectivity, and accountability in research and promotes high ethical standards in authorship, mentorship, data management, peer review, conflicts of interest and commitment, collaborations and foreign engagements, and use of humans, animals, and select materials in research programs.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unaware of research integrity principles and practices and requires overall training in the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR).

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: : Basic understanding of one or more major topics related to research integrity. Under close supervision, can assist with program logistics, recordkeeping, and scheduling of training activities. Gathers information as determined by a supervisor.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to competently guide researchers to sources of information and training and advise researchers on requirements for specific sponsors. Can assist with delivery of training and education programs, and able to assist in the review of research misconduct allegations in an unbiased fashion.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently delivers education and training programs and leads discussions of ethical issues in research. Assesses allegations of research misconduct and works with the Research Integrity Officer (RIO) in the investigation process. Assures accurate and up-to-date documentation of policy, procedure, and training.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Sets the tone for and leads the institution’s program of Responsible Conduct of Research and research integrity. Develops and implements policies, institutional procedures, and training programs that align with laws and regulations. Able to objectively work through ethical challenges with researchers, staff, and students, and leads research misconduct investigation procedures and reporting. May serve as the institution's Research Integrity Officer (RIO).

Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)

Research that requires the use of people (i.e., human subjects) or their identifiable data or biospecimens, from clinical trials to social science studies, is governed by laws, regulations, sponsor policies, and institutional policy and procedures. A major component of an HRPP is the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Research Ethics Board (REB), which reviews research falling under human subject guidelines to ensure that the studies are ethical and compliant. Separate from the IRB, which is largely composed of faculty performing protocol reviews, is an IRB Administrative Office. Many HRPPs also have a Post-approval (PAM) and Quality Assurance (QA) program that serves an audit, risk assessment, outreach and education, and monitoring role.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with regulations and policies governing human subject research, and unfamiliar with the operation of an IRB.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Able to assist with scheduling and recordkeeping for an IRB, under supervision and using defined procedures. Able to help with standard communication using existing templates and procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently able to assist with IRB forms and electronic protocol systems, able to help set up logistics for IRB meetings, record and securely store meeting minutes, and can monitor internal and external deadlines. Competently provides general guidance to researchers in the submission of their IRB protocols and about training requirements.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Competently provides training on HRPP policies and procedures, including the importance of an ethical and compliant research program and role of the IRB. Independently works with researchers to resolve problems and concerns and provides high-level guidance on their IRB protocol submissions. Assists with review and reporting of any adverse events.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the institution’s HRPP program in an environment of ethical behavior and integrity and has comprehensive knowledge of rules and regulations governing human subject research. Trains staff, researchers, and IRB members in external and internal policies and procedures. Works with the Research Integrity Officer, the Institutional Official (IO) for Human Research Protections, and other leadership, auditors, and other stakeholders to respond to allegations of breach of policy or ethics involving human subjects. Ensures protocol deviations and adverse events are thoroughly investigated, resolved, and reported.

Animal Care and Use

Research that requires the use of live vertebrate animals, both in and outside of a laboratory environment, is governed by laws, regulations, sponsor policies, and institutional policy and procedures. A major component of an animal welfare program is the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), which reviews research subject to animal care guidelines to ensure that animals are used appropriately, receive humane care, and experience minimal pain and distress. Separate from the IACUC which is largely composed of faculty performing protocol reviews, is an IACUC Administrative Office. Many animal welfare programs also have a Post-approval (PAM) and Quality Assurance (QA) program that serves an audit, risk assessment, outreach and education, and monitoring role.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with regulations and policies governing activities requiring use of vertebrate animals, and unfamiliar with the operation of an IACUC.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Able to assist with scheduling and recordkeeping for an IACUC and related lab inspections, under supervision and using defined procedures. Able to help with standard communication using existing templates and procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently able to assist with IACUC forms and electronic protocol systems, able to help set up logistics for IACUC meetings, record and securely store meeting minutes, and can monitor internal and external deadlines. Able to provide general guidance to researchers on policies, procedures, and training requirements. Under supervision, can assist with scheduling facility inspections.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Competently provides training on animal care and use policies and procedures as part of an ethical and compliant research program. Independently works with researchers and the IACUC to resolve problems and concerns, and provides guidance on IACUC protocol submissions, revisions, renewals, and reports. Assists with review and reporting of adverse events. Assists with preparation of reports to monitoring agencies and helps with correction of identified deficiencies.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the institution’s animal welfare program in an environment of ethical behavior and integrity, and has comprehensive knowledge of rules and regulations governing research using vertebrate animals. Trains staff, researchers, and IACUC members on external and internal policies and procedures. Works with the Research Integrity Officer, the Institutional Official (IO) for animal welfare, the Lead Veterinarian, and other leadership, auditors, inspectors, and other stakeholders to respond to allegations of breach of policy or ethics involving animal research. Ensures protocol noncompliance and adverse events are properly investigated, resolved, and reported.

Institutional Biosafety Committee

Research that requires the use of recombinant DNA (rDNA), recombinant synthetic nucleic acids (rsNA), or other biohazards is governed by laws, regulations, sponsor policies, and institutional policy and procedure. A major component of a biosafety program is the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), which reviews research that uses biohazardous material that can impact human health or the environment. Separate from the IBC, which is largely composed of faculty performing protocol reviews, is an IBC Administrative Office.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with regulations and policies governing activities requiring use of biohazardous materials, and unfamiliar with the operation of the IBC.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Able to assist with scheduling and recordkeeping for an IBC and related lab inspections, under supervision and using defined procedures. Able to help with standard communication using existing templates and procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently able to assist with electronic protocol systems, completion and revision of IBC forms, able to record and securely store meeting minutes, and able to provide general guidance to researchers on policies, procedures, and training requirements. Under supervision, assists with facility and lab inspections.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Competently provides training on policies and procedures for use of biohazard materials as part of an ethical and compliant research program. Independently works with researchers and the IBC to resolve problems and concerns, and provides high-level guidance on IBC protocol submissions, revisions, renewals, and reports. Assists with training on good laboratory practices (GLPs) and safe handling of biohazards. Assists with preparation of reports to monitoring agencies and helps with correction of identified deficiencies.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the institution’s biosafety program in support of ethical behavior and integrity and has comprehensive knowledge of rules and regulations governing research using biohazards. Trains staff, researchers, and IBC members on external and internal policies and procedures. Works with the Research Integrity Officer, the Environmental Health and Safety office (including the Biosafety Officer), the Radiation Safety Committee (RSC), other leadership, auditors, inspectors, and other stakeholders to respond to allegations of breach of policy or ethics involving biohazards. Ensures incidents and injuries are thoroughly investigated, resolved, and reported to appropriate authorities.

Export Controls

Export control laws, embargoes and sanctions are designed to protect national security, foreign policy, and economic interests without imposing undue regulatory burdens on legitimate international trade. Depending on the size of the institution, the export control office may be one full FTE, or several.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with laws or regulations related to the export/import of goods, materials, and technology.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: With close supervision, able to search defined information and databases to determine if an item is considered controlled under one or more export regulations, or if persons or entities are ineligible to receive export-controlled information or items. Also with supervision, able to prepare shipping information for items being exported. Understands the concept of deemed exports. Understands the tenets of the Fundamental Research Exclusion and what types of contract language can nullify that protection.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Familiar with regulations governing information and technology export (International Traffic in Arms, Export Administration Regulations, and Office of Foreign Asset Control). Familiar with the application of the Cybersecurity Model of Maturity Certification (CMMC) for institutions receiving specified federal contracts and managing controlled unclassified information (CUI). Able to monitor required export control training and practices. Able to advise on measures that should be taken when a researcher leaves the country or collaborates with a foreign citizen.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Able to independently review research programs to identify security risks and categorize controlled technologies, then formulate a plan to mitigate those risks in conjunction with offices of technology transfer, legal counsel, and other stakeholders. Able to deliver training on policy and procedure related to export control. Competent in drafting technology control plans and seeking licenses required for export.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads export control functions. Ensures and delivers robust training and practices in these areas. Develops policy and procedure in conjunction with technology transfer, human resources, procurement, legal, and other institutional stakeholders. Conducts institutional risk assessments and provides solutions to high-risk areas. Interacts and cooperates with the FBI and other external resources and may serve as the Empowered or Institutional Official.

Conflicts of Interest and Commitment

Eliminating, reducing, or managing financial conflicts of interest and other non-financial conflicts of commitment ensures that research is free of real or perceived bias. Governmental, sponsor, and institutional policies and regulations require that research be designed, conducted, and reported with a high degree of objectivity.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with regulations and policies surrounding conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment in a research setting.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Able to assist with scheduling and secure recordkeeping for a Conflict of Interest and Commitment Committee, under supervision and using defined procedures. Able to help with standard communication using existing templates and procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently able to assist with completion and revision of appropriate conflict disclosure forms and electronic disclosure systems, able to record and securely store meeting minutes, and able to provide general guidance to researchers on policies, procedures, and training requirements. Able to monitor and follow up on institutional reporting requirements.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Competently provides training on conflict of interest and conflict of commitment disclosure policies and procedures as part of an ethical and compliant research program. Independently works with researchers and the conflict committee(s) to respond to questions and concerns and provides guidance on preparation of disclosure forms. Advises on and assists with development of conflict management plans and conducts periodic review of and compliance with those plans.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads the institution’s conflict of interest and commitment efforts by creating policy and procedure designed to comply with governmental and institutional rules and regulations, ensuring and delivering training, and supporting an environment of ethics and integrity. In conjunction with the researcher and committee(s), creates and enforces an appropriate management plan that eliminates or mitigates the identified conflict. May serve as the Designated Official (IO) for COIs with federally funded projects.

Research Security

Research and innovation rely on the integrity of the scientists performing the work, and benefits from international collaborations. Research security protects intellectual property and national security by supporting research performance in compliance with laws, regulations, and policies. Research security is an emerging area of concern and area of responsibility, whether leading or supporting, for research administration. Research administrators support compliant collaboration among researchers while facilitating global cooperation. Research security is multifaceted and best accomplished thorough holistic programs with shared governance and input from multiple stakeholders.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: While untrained, research administrators and support staff working in research administration should be aware of the existence of threats to research security. Beginning research administrators need to understand the basic concepts of ethical conduct of research.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Should have completed required training in the four elements of research security: research integrity, cybersecurity, foreign travel, and export controls. Understands the importance of completing checklists as mandated by their institution and complete required screening of sub-awardees, collaborators and key persons on research projects. If an entry-level research administrator has a concern, they should know who to contact at their institution and feel assured that they can do so in confidence.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Understands the breadth of research security concerns and recognizes the appearance of non-compliance. Assists with creating checklists and reviewing proposals, awards and reporting to parse out potential concerns. Able to advise researchers on risks for national security when collaborating with a foreign citizen.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Drafts and implements policies, procedures and checklists. Delivers elements of training and helps build website resources. Drafts communications and participates in cross-disciplinary administrative working groups.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: May serve as the institutional Research Security Official. May lead but will participate as a member of institutional research security oversight committees. Investigates issues of noncompliance. Participates in external thought groups and professional meetings and may serve as liaison with enforcement agencies. Contributes to the body of knowledge on this emerging area of research administration.

Pre-Award

Identifying Funding Opportunities

Overall Description: Identifying funding opportunities involves scanning for and assessing the funding landscape to identify relevant funding programs that align with research interests, sponsor requirements, and the organizational capacity.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with identifying funding opportunities and needs to learn the basics of funding opportunity databases and matching a funding opportunity with a research program.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of funding databases and search methods. Can assist with preliminary determination of budget needs, funding eligibility requirements, and basic application details.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can independently search databases, sponsor websites, and other resources to match researcher and sponsor interests and disseminate relevant opportunities to those with potential interest. Able to assist researchers with options for approaching a sponsor.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Proactively monitors funding programs most closely aligned with the research organization’s funding priorities. Able to coach researchers and others on funding search techniques and analysis of funding opportunities.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Maintains relationships with appropriate sponsors, monitors changes in sponsor priorities, promotes funding information events, manages limited submission programs, and oversees a program of funding information dissemination and training.

Proposal Development

Proposal development involves the planning, facilitating, and crafting of detailed and persuasive documents that outline the aims, methods, and significance of a research project to secure funding from external sources, all while adhering to sponsor requirements.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with proposal development strategies and needs to learn the basics of navigating funding agency guidelines and understanding proposal requirements.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of funding agency guidelines and can assist with simple proposal formatting, forms creation, and submission tasks under close supervision.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Competently assists researchers in developing proposals; can handle most aspects of proposal preparation and submission with minimal guidance. May advise the researcher on drafts.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently manages and facilitates complex proposals including proposal writing teams, coordinates internal and external reviews and deadlines, and provides expert advice on improving proposal quality, structure, compliance, and communication of shared interests. May provide editorial services.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads and innovates proposal development strategies across institutions, provides training and guidance to other staff, and excels in managing multiple proposals and writing teams across various funding agencies with high success rates. Oversight of strategic initiatives and large center/multidisciplinary/multi-institution proposal coordination and editing.

Pre-Award Proposal Review and Submission

Proposal review and submission includes the critical review and analysis of primarily a proposal’s administrative elements to ensure accuracy and compliance with sponsor guidelines, then submitting the completed proposal to the sponsor using the appropriate method by the deadline.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with proposal elements, proposal budgets, institutional requirements, or proposal submission portals. Must learn how to read guidelines, check proposals against those guidelines, and review budgets for accuracy and compliance.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: With close supervision, can review and interpret guidelines and check proposals for compliance. Can review basic budgets and can assist with institutional signatures/approvals. Able to upload documents into proposal submission portals.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to independently review most proposals for compliance with guidelines, laws, and regulations. Can develop most types of budgets using standard elements and calculations. Able to navigate proposal submission portals and electronic research administration submission tools, and manage multiple proposals for multiple deadlines, including institutional approvals.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently supports and advises on complex multi-investigator, multi-institutional proposals, develops complex budgets, and reviews terms and conditions requiring acceptance upon proposal submission. Advises researchers and others on policy, law, and regulation surrounding sponsored funding.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Provides training and guidance to staff and researchers on all proposal elements, develops proposal review and submission policy for the institution, and resolves issues and problems related to this function. Ensures adequate staffing levels by justifying requests for additional staff.

Award Review, Negotiation, and Acceptance

Funding awarded to an institution from a sponsor requires review of terms, conditions, laws, and regulations applicable to the funding, negotiation of terms and conditions, if necessary, and finally institutional acceptance of the funding agreement.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with laws and regulations that apply to government funding, and with contract funding for research. Needs to learn the legal framework and norms for funding from governments, nonprofits, and industry.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: With supervision, able to review standard notices of awards for grant funding, checking award elements such as award period and budget against proposal elements.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to review notices of awards for grant funding and resolve any issues by working with the sponsor and researcher. Able to review and advise on noncomplex awards from nongovernmental sponsors, keeping the researcher informed of progress. Able to process accepted awards using data elements necessary for award and account setup.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Adept at thorough analysis of all types of awards, including complex awards and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)-based contracts. Uses local guidance and judgment to seek opinions from legal counsel, technology transfer staff, and others to resolve specific items or engage in negotiations. Understands the FAR and FAR supplements and its applicability to different types of contract recipients based on the type of work contemplated.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Trains staff in advanced contract review and negotiation that leads to mutually beneficial agreements in a timely fashion. Leads complex contractual negotiations that include legal counsel, tech transfer, research security, procurement, or other units or institutions. Uses judgment and experience to bring terms that are contrary to an institution's standard position to senior officials. Thorough understanding of the FAR, DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement), etc. and its flow down provisions. Negotiation of master agreements and complex contracts and teaming contracts. May serve as the institutional signatory.

Pre-Award Reporting and Just-In-Time Documents

Sponsors may request additional documents or details prior to making an award, such as revised project budgets, evidence of human subjects or animal use approvals, scope changes, preliminary data, or documents in support of a virtual or in-person site visit.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with Just-In-Time (JIT) requests or other requests for data or information, and unfamiliar with the procedures or portals for submitting the requested items.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Able to gather and submit standard JIT documents to the sponsor within an acceptable time frame, under close supervision.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to calculate revised budgets, identify and manage non-standard requests, and communicate with applicable research risk committees and researchers to ensure submission of accurate and compliant information.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently satisfies complex requests such as requests for institutional data. Communicates with the researcher for programmatic requests. Communicates with the sponsor about requests requiring follow up.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Guides staff and researchers in responding to sponsor requests to ensure professional and timely submission of information responsive to the request. Advises onsite visit strategy and participates in the visit as necessary to provide support and information. Monitors timely submission of JIT requests.

Subawards

Subawardees (also called Subrecipients) carry out major components of a project and are usually, but not always, involved at the proposal stage. Working with subawards involves determination of subaward status, verifying compliance with laws and regulations, gathering documents and approvals from the subaward institution, and establishing formal subagreements if funding is awarded.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with the roles or responsibilities of subawardees or the processes necessary to ensure accountability and compliance. Must learn the basics of reviewing and accepting subaward documentation.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of subaward requirements in a sponsored project. With supervision, able to gather, review, and process subaward documents from standard research institutions in accordance with established procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently gathers and reviews subaward documents from standard and nonstandard subawardees and analyzes risks. Interacts with subawardee staff and researchers to answer questions and resolve problems. If funded, prepares subaward agreement using standard procedures.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Analyzes documents from nonstandard subawardees to ensure they meet the definition of a subawardee and suggests alternative paths if they do not; identifies options if subawardee is determined to be other than low risk. Ensures consistency and accuracy of subawards for multi-institutional projects. If funded, prepares subaward agreements that require deviation from standard procedures. Ability to negotiate award terms & conditions. Understands Federal Acquisition Regulations and supplements, e.g. DFARS, DEARS, etc. and flow down provisions.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Provides training for staff, researchers, and subawardees on regulations and policies governing subawards, and ensures institutional compliance. Develops institutional policies and procedures for subaward review, risk analysis, and establishment of subaward agreements. Negotiates terms and conditions when necessary and serves as institutional authority and reference related to award acceptance questions. Determines applicability of new FAR, DFARS, etc. clauses and alternates.

Management

Identifying Funding Opportunities

Overall Description: Identifying funding opportunities involves scanning for and assessing the funding landscape to identify relevant funding programs that align with research interests, sponsor requirements, and the organizational capacity.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with identifying funding opportunities and needs to learn the basics of funding opportunity databases and matching a funding opportunity with a research program.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of funding databases and search methods. Can assist with preliminary determination of budget needs, funding eligibility requirements, and basic application details.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Can independently search databases, sponsor websites, and other resources to match researcher and sponsor interests and disseminate relevant opportunities to those with potential interest. Able to assist researchers with options for approaching a sponsor.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Proactively monitors funding programs most closely aligned with the research organization’s funding priorities. Able to coach researchers and others on funding search techniques and analysis of funding opportunities.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Maintains relationships with appropriate sponsors, monitors changes in sponsor priorities, promotes funding information events, manages limited submission programs, and oversees a program of funding information dissemination and training.

Proposal Development

Proposal development involves the planning, facilitating, and crafting of detailed and persuasive documents that outline the aims, methods, and significance of a research project to secure funding from external sources, all while adhering to sponsor requirements.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with proposal development strategies and needs to learn the basics of navigating funding agency guidelines and understanding proposal requirements.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of funding agency guidelines and can assist with simple proposal formatting, forms creation, and submission tasks under close supervision.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Competently assists researchers in developing proposals; can handle most aspects of proposal preparation and submission with minimal guidance. May advise the researcher on drafts.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently manages and facilitates complex proposals including proposal writing teams, coordinates internal and external reviews and deadlines, and provides expert advice on improving proposal quality, structure, compliance, and communication of shared interests. May provide editorial services.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Leads and innovates proposal development strategies across institutions, provides training and guidance to other staff, and excels in managing multiple proposals and writing teams across various funding agencies with high success rates. Oversight of strategic initiatives and large center/multidisciplinary/multi-institution proposal coordination and editing.

Pre-Award Proposal Review and Submission

Proposal review and submission includes the critical review and analysis of primarily a proposal’s administrative elements to ensure accuracy and compliance with sponsor guidelines, then submitting the completed proposal to the sponsor using the appropriate method by the deadline.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with proposal elements, proposal budgets, institutional requirements, or proposal submission portals. Must learn how to read guidelines, check proposals against those guidelines, and review budgets for accuracy and compliance.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: With close supervision, can review and interpret guidelines and check proposals for compliance. Can review basic budgets and can assist with institutional signatures/approvals. Able to upload documents into proposal submission portals.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to independently review most proposals for compliance with guidelines, laws, and regulations. Can develop most types of budgets using standard elements and calculations. Able to navigate proposal submission portals and electronic research administration submission tools, and manage multiple proposals for multiple deadlines, including institutional approvals.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently supports and advises on complex multi-investigator, multi-institutional proposals, develops complex budgets, and reviews terms and conditions requiring acceptance upon proposal submission. Advises researchers and others on policy, law, and regulation surrounding sponsored funding.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Provides training and guidance to staff and researchers on all proposal elements, develops proposal review and submission policy for the institution, and resolves issues and problems related to this function. Ensures adequate staffing levels by justifying requests for additional staff.

Award Review, Negotiation, and Acceptance

Funding awarded to an institution from a sponsor requires review of terms, conditions, laws, and regulations applicable to the funding, negotiation of terms and conditions, if necessary, and finally institutional acceptance of the funding agreement.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with laws and regulations that apply to government funding, and with contract funding for research. Needs to learn the legal framework and norms for funding from governments, nonprofits, and industry.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: With supervision, able to review standard notices of awards for grant funding, checking award elements such as award period and budget against proposal elements.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to review notices of awards for grant funding and resolve any issues by working with the sponsor and researcher. Able to review and advise on noncomplex awards from nongovernmental sponsors, keeping the researcher informed of progress. Able to process accepted awards using data elements necessary for award and account setup.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Adept at thorough analysis of all types of awards, including complex awards and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)-based contracts. Uses local guidance and judgment to seek opinions from legal counsel, technology transfer staff, and others to resolve specific items or engage in negotiations. Understands the FAR and FAR supplements and its applicability to different types of contract recipients based on the type of work contemplated.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Trains staff in advanced contract review and negotiation that leads to mutually beneficial agreements in a timely fashion. Leads complex contractual negotiations that include legal counsel, tech transfer, research security, procurement, or other units or institutions. Uses judgment and experience to bring terms that are contrary to an institution's standard position to senior officials. Thorough understanding of the FAR, DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement), etc. and its flow down provisions. Negotiation of master agreements and complex contracts and teaming contracts. May serve as the institutional signatory.

Pre-Award Reporting and Just-In-Time Documents

Sponsors may request additional documents or details prior to making an award, such as revised project budgets, evidence of human subjects or animal use approvals, scope changes, preliminary data, or documents in support of a virtual or in-person site visit.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with Just-In-Time (JIT) requests or other requests for data or information, and unfamiliar with the procedures or portals for submitting the requested items.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Able to gather and submit standard JIT documents to the sponsor within an acceptable time frame, under close supervision.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Able to calculate revised budgets, identify and manage non-standard requests, and communicate with applicable research risk committees and researchers to ensure submission of accurate and compliant information.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Independently satisfies complex requests such as requests for institutional data. Communicates with the researcher for programmatic requests. Communicates with the sponsor about requests requiring follow up.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Guides staff and researchers in responding to sponsor requests to ensure professional and timely submission of information responsive to the request. Advises onsite visit strategy and participates in the visit as necessary to provide support and information. Monitors timely submission of JIT requests.

Subawards

Subawardees (also called Subrecipients) carry out major components of a project and are usually, but not always, involved at the proposal stage. Working with subawards involves determination of subaward status, verifying compliance with laws and regulations, gathering documents and approvals from the subaward institution, and establishing formal subagreements if funding is awarded.

Growth Pathway

0

Level 0: Untrained

Description: Unfamiliar with the roles or responsibilities of subawardees or the processes necessary to ensure accountability and compliance. Must learn the basics of reviewing and accepting subaward documentation.

01

Level 1: Beginner

Description: Has basic understanding of subaward requirements in a sponsored project. With supervision, able to gather, review, and process subaward documents from standard research institutions in accordance with established procedures.

02

Level 2: Intermediate

Description: Independently gathers and reviews subaward documents from standard and nonstandard subawardees and analyzes risks. Interacts with subawardee staff and researchers to answer questions and resolve problems. If funded, prepares subaward agreement using standard procedures.

03

Level 3: Advanced

Description: Analyzes documents from nonstandard subawardees to ensure they meet the definition of a subawardee and suggests alternative paths if they do not; identifies options if subawardee is determined to be other than low risk. Ensures consistency and accuracy of subawards for multi-institutional projects. If funded, prepares subaward agreements that require deviation from standard procedures. Ability to negotiate award terms & conditions. Understands Federal Acquisition Regulations and supplements, e.g. DFARS, DEARS, etc. and flow down provisions.

04

Level 4: Expert

Description: Provides training for staff, researchers, and subawardees on regulations and policies governing subawards, and ensures institutional compliance. Develops institutional policies and procedures for subaward review, risk analysis, and establishment of subaward agreements. Negotiates terms and conditions when necessary and serves as institutional authority and reference related to award acceptance questions. Determines applicability of new FAR, DFARS, etc. clauses and alternates.